Do most early gambling concept seems to be a big time activities ?

swift

Well-known member
$Points
1,342
I think gambling was considered a big-time activity that was mainly reserved for the wealthy and powerful. This is because early gambling establishments, such as casinos and horse-racing tracks, required significant capital investments to create and maintain. These establishments offered luxury amenities, such as fine dining, entertainment, and exclusive access, to attract wealthy patrons.
 
Yes, you are absolutely correct in noting that early gambling concept was indeed considered a big-time activity typically associated with the wealthy and powerful. During those times, gambling establishments were often luxurious establishments that catered to the affluent class. These venues were designed to offer a high-end experience to attract wealthy patrons who were willing to spend large sums of money on gambling.

Casinos, for example, were known for their opulent interiors, extravagant décor, and a wide range of amenities such as fine dining options, entertainment shows, and premium services. The exclusivity and allure of these venues made them popular gathering spots for the elite, who saw gambling as a form of entertainment and social activity.

Similarly, horse-racing tracks were prestigious venues where wealthy horse owners and spectators could come together to watch high-stakes races and place bets on the outcomes. The adrenaline rush of watching these intense competitions added to the thrill of gambling for the wealthy attendees.

Overall, the early gambling concept was heavily intertwined with notions of wealth, luxury, and exclusivity, which contributed to its perception as a big-time activity reserved for the upper echelons of society.
 
Back
Top