Do you think it's better to play for a set amount of time or until you reach a certain profit?

[Mike_25]

Gamblers often debate the better strategy: setting a time limit or hitting a profit target to end a casino visit. Which brings more success long term - strictly playing for 2 hours then cashing out, or playing until winning a set amount then leaving? On one hand, a time limit removes emotional bias to keep gambling when winning. Yet a profit target fully captures wins, ensuring you maximize your successful streaks. What has worked better for you - a fixed time cap or profit threshold - to walk away with the most money at the end of a casino trip? I'd love to hear players' strategies and experiences.

 

[James108]

This is a matter of personal preference, and there is no right or wrong answer. Some players prefer to set a time limit for their play, while others prefer to play until they reach a certain profit. There are benefits and drawbacks to both approaches. Playing for a set amount of time can help you stick to your budget and avoid overspending.