Is it better to hit or stand on 16 vs dealer's 7?

[Datweirdo]

When considering whether to hit or stand on a 16 against a dealer's 7, it's generally better to hit. The dealer is likely to have a strong hand and the risk of busting with a hit is outweighed by the need to improve your hand. Standing on 16 against a 7 puts you at a significant disadvantage since you're likely to lose against the dealer's potential higher total. Thus, hitting is the more strategic choice in this scenario.

 

[CR7]

When facing a dealer's 7 in blackjack with a player hand of 16, the decision between hitting and standing can be quite challenging. In this situation, the basic strategy advises players to hit rather than stand. The reason behind this is to try and improve the hand's total in order to beat the dealer, who has a strong upcard.

Standing on 16 against a dealer's 7 is risky, as the dealer has a high likelihood of having a strong hand with the 7 as the upcard. By hitting, the player hopes to improve the hand to a total that can beat the dealer without risking an immediate bust. While hitting on 16 may result in a bust sometimes, the overall probability of achieving a better hand by hitting outweighs the risk of busting.

It's important to remember that blackjack is a game of probabilities and making decisions based on the statistical likelihood of outcomes can help improve your chances of winning in the long run. While it may feel counterintuitive to hit on 16 against a dealer's 7, following basic strategy can lead to better results over time.

 

[Lazza]

Since it has a lower chance of winning, a total of 16 is weak against a dealer's 7. Since the dealer is likely to beat you, standing on 16 reduces your chances of winning the hand in poker.