In blackjack, it's generally better to stand on a hard 17, as hitting carries a high risk of busting without a significant chance of improving your hand. The dealer's chances of busting are also a factor, especially if their upcard is weak. While some variations of the game or specific dealer upcards may suggest otherwise, standing is the most common recommendation.
Is it better to stand on a hard 17 or hit?
- Thread starter Jonah
- Start date
Absolutely! Standing on a hard 17 in blackjack is a classic strategy because hitting carries the risk of busting with a 17 and doesn't significantly improve your hand. It's crucial to weigh the odds of busting against the possibility of winning against the dealer's hand. Factors like the dealer's upcard strength and the game's specific rules can influence the decision, but in most cases, standing on a hard 17 is the optimal play.
Similar threads
- Question