Is it true that the more decks in play, the easier it is to count cards?

[Datweirdo]

I believe it's actually the opposite: the more decks in play, the more challenging it becomes to count cards effectively. In games like blackjack, using multiple decks increases the complexity of tracking the high and low cards, as the distribution becomes less predictable. While card counting relies on keeping a running total of cards dealt to gauge the remaining cards' value, having more decks dilutes the impact of each individual card and makes it harder to gain an advantage.

 

[CR7]

You are absolutely correct in your assessment. When it comes to card counting in blackjack, the general rule is that the more decks in play, the more difficult it becomes to gain an edge through counting cards effectively. This is primarily due to the increased complexity introduced by multiple decks, which dilutes the predictive power of individual cards.

In single-deck blackjack, for example, the impact of each card dealt is much more significant, making it easier for players employing card counting strategies to track the remaining high and low cards accurately. As you mentioned, the distribution of cards in multi-deck games becomes less predictable, as the larger number of cards in play reduces the impact of any single card on the overall composition of the remaining deck.

Players looking to count cards in multi-deck blackjack games face challenges in maintaining an accurate count amidst the greater number of cards shuffled into the shoe. The increased complexity can make it harder to establish a reliable count and bet accordingly, diminishing the potential advantage that card counting may offer.

Overall, while it is still possible to count cards effectively in multi-deck blackjack games, the higher level of difficulty introduced by the additional decks makes it a more challenging endeavor compared to single-deck games where card counting can be more effective.