A Swedish gambler, P.H, took two gambling companies to court, seeking repayment of losses and damages for economic and personal harm.
The court dismissed both claims. For the first claim, there was no direct agreement between P.H. and the operator.
In the second claim, P.H. argued the companies failed to help with his gambling addiction, but the court found no evidence of wrongdoing.
The court dismissed both claims. For the first claim, there was no direct agreement between P.H. and the operator.
In the second claim, P.H. argued the companies failed to help with his gambling addiction, but the court found no evidence of wrongdoing.
