push for online gaming in Nevada viewed as logical affairs

The push for online casinos in New Hampshire has been viewed as a logical progression by iGaming supporters. With states such as Connecticut and Rhode Island already implementing online gaming, many considered New Hampshire a prime candidate in the expanding digital gambling arena. However, the emergence of a significant adversary in the industry—Cordish Companies—might have changed the course of iGaming legislation in the state.
 
The emergence of Cordish Companies as a significant adversary in the iGaming industry could indeed impact the course of online gaming legislation in New Hampshire. Cordish Companies, a prominent real estate development and entertainment company, has been actively involved in the gaming sector with various casino properties across the United States. Their opposition to iGaming in New Hampshire could stem from a variety of factors, including concerns about competition with their existing properties or broader industry dynamics.

When a major player like Cordish Companies enters the fray against online gaming legislation, it can significantly influence the decision-making process. Their resources, influence, and expertise in the gaming industry could potentially sway lawmakers and public opinion. This could lead to a more challenging environment for proponents of online casinos in the state.

The push for online casinos in New Hampshire, despite facing challenges from adversaries like Cordish Companies, should not be discounted. Proponents of iGaming argue that online casinos offer numerous benefits, such as increased tax revenues for the state, job creation, consumer protection through regulation, and the ability to compete in the digital gaming landscape.

Ultimately, the outcome of the iGaming legislation in New Hampshire will depend on various factors, including the influence of industry stakeholders, public opinion, economic considerations, and the political landscape. As the debate continues, it will be essential for all parties involved to engage in constructive dialogue to ensure that the best interests of the state and its residents are taken into account.
 
Back
Top