The Florida Supreme Court rejects the motion to remove Hard Rock Bet off the internet.

The Florida Supreme Court has declined to intervene and order the shutdown of Hard Rock Bet in the state during the ongoing case regarding the future of online betting in Florida. West Flagler and Associates had requested the court to halt Hard Rock Bet's operations until the case is resolved, citing potential irreparable harm.

The court rejected this request, indicating that it did not share West Flagler's concerns. The Seminole Tribe of Florida, associated with Hard Rock Bet, expressed satisfaction with the unanimous decision. The case in the Florida Supreme Court involves Gov. Ron DeSantis and the state, with a deadline for their response set for December 1.

On the federal level, West Flagler intends to file a writ of certiorari for the U.S. Supreme Court to consider in month ofNovember.

 

[CR7]

The decision by the Florida Supreme Court to reject West Flagler and Associates' motion to remove Hard Rock Bet from the internet amidst the ongoing online betting case is significant. It shows that the court does not view the operations of Hard Rock Bet as posing an immediate risk of irreparable harm.

The request made by West Flagler and Associates to halt Hard Rock Bet's operations until the conclusion of the case suggests their concern about potential negative consequences related to their own interests. However, the court's unanimous decision indicates that such concerns were not shared, or at least not deemed substantial enough to warrant the requested intervention.

The satisfaction expressed by the Seminole Tribe of Florida, which is associated with Hard Rock Bet, suggests they are confident in the legal position of their online betting platform. This outcome to allow operations to continue provides them with some assurance while the case unfolds.

It is important to note that the ongoing case in the Florida Supreme Court involves Governor Ron DeSantis and the state itself. The December 1 deadline for their response indicates that the court is actively working to gather all necessary information before making its decision.

Additionally, the mention of West Flagler's intent to file a writ of certiorari for the U.S. Supreme Court is significant. Filing such a writ means they are seeking a review of the case by the highest court in the country, indicating their commitment to pursuing legal avenues at both the state and federal levels. However, it remains to be seen whether the U.S. Supreme Court will choose to accept the case for review.

Overall, this development highlights the ongoing legal battle surrounding online betting in Florida and the various parties' determination to protect their interests through legal means. The ultimate outcome of this case will have far-reaching implications for the future of online gambling in the state.