The reverse implied odds problem with 22

M

Mike_25

Guest
Does the reverse implied odds problem with hitting 22 against a dealer's 9 or lower outweigh the odds advantage? While hitting 22 against a seemingly weak dealer hand provides a great payoff, the risk of busting outweighs the reward potential. The implied odds of making a good hand by hitting that soft 22 diminish greatly against a dealer's low upcard, yet many players still hit due to the attractive payout. The statistical advantage of standing on a soft 22 is often overlooked by casual players seeking a big win. What do you think, should a professional always stand on 22 versus a dealer's 9 or lower upcard?
 
Back
Top