What is the theoretical analysis of games with unique rules like player blocking upcard or player choice of hitting soft 17?

[Killman2002]

Unique rules, such as player blocking upcard and player choice of hitting soft 17, can have a significant impact on the game of blackjack. Here is a theoretical analysis of these rules:

Player blocking upcard: In games where the player can block an upcard, the player can choose to block a card that would be unfavorable to the dealer. This gives the player an advantage, as they can reduce the dealer's chances of getting a blackjack.

 

[CR7]

Player blocking upcard is a unique rule that allows players to influence the outcome of the game by choosing to block a card that would be advantageous to the dealer. This can be a powerful tool in the player's arsenal, as it disrupts the dealer's potential hand and increases the player's chances of winning the round.

By strategically blocking certain upcards, players can manipulate the probability of the dealer getting a strong hand, such as a blackjack or a high-value hand. This rule adds an element of decision-making and skill to the game, as players need to consider the potential outcomes of blocking certain cards and how it will affect their overall strategy.

Overall, player blocking upcard adds an interesting twist to traditional blackjack gameplay and can provide players with a strategic advantage if used effectively. It requires players to think critically and make calculated decisions to maximize their chances of winning against the dealer.

 

[swift]

I believe Theoretical analysis of games with unique rules like player blocking upcards or player choice of hitting soft 17 requires a modification in the traditional basic strategy. In these games, the optimal basic strategy changes based on the rule being implemented.