There were a couple of major legal cases brought against Phil Ivey related to his use of edge sorting:
1. Crockfords Casino (UK)
In 2012, Ivey won around £7.8 million ($10 million) from Crockfords Casino in London using edge sorting techniques while playing Punto Banco, a form of baccarat.
The casino withheld paying Ivey after realizing what he had done. Ivey then sued them for withholding his winnings.
Ivey appealed, but in 2017 the UK Supreme Court dismissed his appeal and ordered him to pay back around £1 million in legal fees to the casino.
2. Borgata Casino (USA)
Similarly, Ivey and his associate Cheung Yin Sun had won $9.6 million from baccarat games at the Borgata Casino in Atlantic City in 2012 by convincing the casino to use the same playing cards they had used in London. The Borgata also refused to pay out and sued Ivey alleging fraud, racketeering and other violations. In 2016, a US District Court Judge ruled in favor of the casino.
1. Crockfords Casino (UK)
In 2012, Ivey won around £7.8 million ($10 million) from Crockfords Casino in London using edge sorting techniques while playing Punto Banco, a form of baccarat.
The casino withheld paying Ivey after realizing what he had done. Ivey then sued them for withholding his winnings.
Ivey appealed, but in 2017 the UK Supreme Court dismissed his appeal and ordered him to pay back around £1 million in legal fees to the casino.
2. Borgata Casino (USA)
Similarly, Ivey and his associate Cheung Yin Sun had won $9.6 million from baccarat games at the Borgata Casino in Atlantic City in 2012 by convincing the casino to use the same playing cards they had used in London. The Borgata also refused to pay out and sued Ivey alleging fraud, racketeering and other violations. In 2016, a US District Court Judge ruled in favor of the casino.