M
Mike_25
Guest
Between the two, I don't claim a straight preference for one over the other. Each style of play suits a different mindset and what I'm lookin' to get out of the game. Sometimes live brings out the thrill-seeker in me, hopin' to score a massive live pot. Other days I prefer the solitude of online, makin' plays at my own pace without babysittin' alcohol and egos.
In the end, a great poker player adapts their strategy and aggression based on the players at the table, not whether it's felt or virtual. You analyze what you can see, whether it's cards or tells, using any advantage available. But as a man who's spent decades on the road, I know I'll always come back to live poker again for the opportunity of a monster pot, glimpse of a familiar face or memory of a storied hand. The tables call in a way online never quite could.
So if you have a preference for one over the other, that's your call as a player. Me, I'll play where the best games and biggest action settle on any given day. The thrill's in the cards, not the venue.
In the end, a great poker player adapts their strategy and aggression based on the players at the table, not whether it's felt or virtual. You analyze what you can see, whether it's cards or tells, using any advantage available. But as a man who's spent decades on the road, I know I'll always come back to live poker again for the opportunity of a monster pot, glimpse of a familiar face or memory of a storied hand. The tables call in a way online never quite could.
So if you have a preference for one over the other, that's your call as a player. Me, I'll play where the best games and biggest action settle on any given day. The thrill's in the cards, not the venue.
