Why Ace-2 is Often Better Than Splitting Aces

[Mike_25]

Fellow card players, why do you think Ace-2 often plays better than splitting Aces against a dealer's mid-card? While splitting seems ideal to double chances for a Blackjack, the second Ace often busts or ends with a weak hand. Ace-2 combined hits a useful total in many cases, especially on a 4-9 upcard. What are your views on playing Ace-2 versus splitting Aces when the dealer shows a mid-range card? I would love to hear your experiences and strategies on this issue.